'Ey up AI I have frequently mentioned AI, and sit on the fence when it comes to its use. In my opinion it is wrong that people should lose jobs and large businesses should hide behind AI to ignore people's complaints, but that is only my opinion and nothing will change. But when it comes to its use in far more important matters, such as bird identification, I have evidence that it is frequently inaccurate. I think most people realise it's not totally accurate, but the problem is relying on it. I so often see posts about identification which say "Merlin says" or "Obsidentify makes it a". The issue is not whether you have the correct identification or not, but whether you're prepared to learn by its mistakes. If you don't want to improve in what you do, fine, but most of us would surely rather learn birds as we go through life than just accept a "guess" from some piece of technology. I have come to realise after over fifty years of havin...